DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20184270

Comparison of Typhidot IgM test and blood culture in children with clinically compatible enteric fever

Sandeep Garg, Ajay Sankhe, Anuradha Joshi, Samrat Mehta

Abstract


Background: The often-non-specific presentation of typhoid fever makes clinical diagnosis difficult. The blood culture is time consuming, affected by often given prior antibiotics and has low sensitivity (60%). Typhidot IgM gives quick results in early stage of disease. Pediatric data are scarce. So, we studied and compare Typhidot IgM test and blood culture in children with clinically compatible enteric fever.

Methods: This was retrospective observational study done in Department of Pediatrics from the 1st October, 2017 to 30 September, 2018. 42 children with clinically compatible enteric fever (aged 6 months to 18 years); with either typhidot IgM or blood culture positive for Salmonella species were sampled and analyzed.

Results: Typhidot IgM test had sensitivity of 92.7% (N = 39/42) compared to blood culture with sensitivity of 79.4% (N = 27/34). 2 out of 3 typhidot negative cases were S. Paratyphi positive in blood culture. Typhidot IgM had positive predictive value = 97.4% due to 1 false positive case. 19 (79.2%) out of 24 blood culture positive patients had not received any antibiotic prior test, 3 (60 %) out of 5 blood culture negative patients had received antibiotics.

Conclusions: Typhidot IgM is a highly sensitive quick diagnostic tool for diagnosing enteric fever in children with sensitivity of 92.3% and PPV of 97.4% compared to blood culture (sensitivity= 79.4%). It is more sensitive to diagnose S. typhi enteric fever (sensitivity= 97.3%) then S. paratyphi (sensitivity= 50%). Antibiotic administration prior to blood culture testing reduces its positivity rate but not significantly statistically. Larger studies are needed to change the current recommendations on typhidot IgM.


Keywords


Blood culture, Children, Enteric fever, Typhoid fever, Typhidot IgM

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO. Background paper to SAGE on Typhoid Policy Recommendations. 2017. http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2017/october/1_Typhoid_SAGE_background_paper_Final_v3B.pdf?ua=1, accessed December 2017

GOI 2014 National health profile 2013, DGHS, Ministry of health and family welfare, New Delhi.

Britto C et al. An appraisal of the clinical features of pediatric enteric fever: systematic review and meta-analysis of the age-stratified disease occurrence. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1604–1611

Weekly epidemiological record. 30 March,2018, 93th year no 13, 2018, 93, 153–172

Wijedoru L et al. Rapid diagnostic tests for typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric) fever. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD008892

Wijedoru L, Mallett S, Parry CM. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5:CD008892. Rapid diagnostic tests for typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric) fever.

Beig FK1, Ahmad F, Ekram M, Shukla I. Typhidot M and Diazo test vis-à-vis blood culture and Widal test in the early diagnosis of typhoid fever in children in a resource poor setting, Braz J Infect Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;14(6):589-93

Karen H Keddy a, Arvinda Sooka a, Maupi E Letsoalo b, Greta Hoyland c, Claire Lise Chaignat d, Anne B Morrissey e & John A Crump e,Sensitivity and specificity of typhoid fever rapid antibody tests for laboratory diagnosis at two sub-Saharan African sites. Published online: 13 June 2011. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2011;89:640-647

Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta. 198.2 Enteric Fever (Typhoid Fever). In: Robert M. Kliegman, Bonita F. Stanton, Joseph W. St Geme III, Nina F. Schor, Richard E. Behrman, editors. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 20th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. P.1388-1392

De D, Sunilbala K, Mondal AR, Singh KI. Evaluation of typhi

dot test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in children in RIMS hospital. IOSR-JDMS. 2016;15: 19-21

Mogasale V, Ramani E, Mogasale VV, Park J. What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review. Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2016 Dec;15(1):32.

Jog S, Soman R, Singhal T, Rodrigues C, Mehta A, Dastur FD. Enteric fever in Mumbai–clinical profile, sensitivity patterns and response to antimicrobials. JAPI. 2008 Apr;56:237-40.