Open versus closed peripheral intravenous catheters in neonates: a prospective comparative study

Authors

  • Kavitha Gopalan Department of Neonatology, Institute of Child Health & Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Kamalarathnam C. N. Department of Neonatology, Institute of Child Health & Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Ramya S. Department of Neonatology, Institute of Child Health & Hospital for Children, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20193097

Keywords:

Closed intravenous catheter, Indwelling time, Neonates, Open intravenous catheter, Phlebitis

Abstract

Background: Open peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters have been routinely used in neonates. Closed catheters have resulted in a longer indwelling time and reduction in catheter related complications such as phlebitis in adults. However, there is paucity of data in neonates.

Methods: We conducted this pilot study in a pre-post study design. Open catheters were used in the first phase and closed catheters in the second phase. Hundred babies requiring intravenous fluid therapy for at least 24 hours in this neonatal intensive care unit were included in each group. Indwelling time and the complications leading to removal of the catheter were compared between the two groups.

Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of gestational age, day of life, site of cannulation, nature of intravenous fluid and drugs administered. In the open catheter group, there was significant increase in use of inotropes (38% vs 22%; p=0.014) and blood products (16% vs 5%; p=0.011). The mean indwelling time (hours) was significantly greater in closed catheter group compared to open catheter group (47.1±19.4 vs 38.04±17.9; p <0.008). Inotrope use was found to decrease the indwelling time. There was an increase in indwelling time by 8.2 (SE 2.67) hours even after adjusting for use of inotropes. The incidence of catheter related complications was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: There is a marginal but statistically significant increase in indwelling time when closed peripheral IV catheters are used in neonates. However, our results would be more meaningful if replicated in a larger randomized controlled trial.

References

Gupta P, Rai R, Basu S, Faridi MM. Life span of peripheral intravenous cannula in a neonatal intensive care unit of a developing country. J pediatric Nurs. 2003;18(4):287-92.

Wyckoff MM. Midline catheter use in the premature and full-term infant. J Vasc Access Devic. 1999;4(3):26-9.

López JG, Vilela AA, Del Palacio EF, Corral JO, Martí CB, Portal PH. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. J Hospital Infect. 2014;86(2):117-26.

Johnson RV, Donn SM. Life span of intravenous cannulas in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Dis Childr. 1988;142(9):968-71.

Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Edu. 2010;15(5):625-32.

Maddox RR, Rush DR, Rapp RP, Foster TS, Mazella V, McKean HE. Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis. Am J Health-System Pharm. 1977;34(1):29-34.

Phelps SJ, Helms RA. Risk factors affecting infiltration of peripheral venous lines in infants. J Pediat. 1987;111(3):384-9.

Dalal SS, Chawla D, Singh J, Agarwal RK, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Limb splinting for intravenous cannulae in neonates: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(6):F394-6.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles