DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20202057

Revisiting ureteral substitution and its outcome in children: single centre 13 year experience

Natasha L. Vageriya, Shivaji B. Mane, Taha Daginawala, Himangi Athawhale, Hussain Kotawala, Prathamesh More

Abstract


Background: Objective of this study is to explore various ureteric substitutes in pediatric age group and their outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was done from 2003-2016, of all patients operated in this hospital that had undergone ureteral replacement. Thirteen such patients (5 from initially published paper (1) and 8 new patients) were followed up to find conduit patency, renal function and related complications with their outcomes assessed.

Results: Ureteric substitution was done in 8 patients. Age of the patient ranged from 4 months to 8 years. Out of these for 2 patients monti tube was created; one with colon and other jejunum, rest of the 6 patient appendix was used. On follow up one patient had early appendico-ureteral leak requiring re-anastomosis and one patient had partial obstruction at 6 months corrected by dividing mesentry and untwisting appendix. With a mean follow up of 3.8 years all patients have preserved renal functions and drainage present. Also 5 patients of ureteral substitution performed at this institution and published prior were followed up with mean follow up of 10.4 years having no complaints with preserved function and unobstructed drainage.

Conclusions: This small series supports that not only appendix and ileum but even colon as well as jejunum should be considered as Monti’s tube for ureteric replacement, when confronting with short ureter in paediatric age group.


Keywords


Monti tube, Ureteral substitution, Ureteric substitutes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Richter F, Stock JA, Hanna MK. The appendix as right ureteral substitute in children. J Urol. 2000 Jun 1;163(6):1908-12.

Zhong W, Hong P, Ding G, Yang K, Li X, Bao J, Bao G, Cui L, Men C, Li Z, Zhang P. Technical considerations and outcomes for ileal ureter replacement: a retrospective study in China. BMC Surg. 2019 Dec 1;19(1):9.

Obaidah A, Mane SB, Dhende NP, Acharya H, Goel N, Thakur AA, et al. Our experience of ureteral substitution in pediatric age group. Urology. 2010 Jun 1;75(6):1476-80.

Elsalamony T, Farid M, Sabra M, Hamdy A, Sayed M, Abdel-Azim H, et al. Ureteric replacement for ureteral defects: principles of therapy and results. AAMJ. 2011 Apr;9(2).

Corbetta JP, Weller S, Bortagaray JI, Durán V, Burek C, Sager C, Lopez JC. Ureteral replacement with appendix in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplantat. 2012 May;16(3):235-8.

Yoon BI, Hong CG, Seol Kim U, Ha S, Chung JH, Kim SW, et al. Ureteral substitution using appendix for a ureteral defect caused by a retroperitoneal rhabdomyosarcoma in a child. Korean J Urol. 2014 Jan;55(1):77.

Byun SS, Kim JH, Oh SJ, Kim HH. Simple retrograde balloon dilation for treatment of ureteral strictures: etiology-based analysis. Yonsei Medi J. 2003 Apr 1;44(2):273-8.

Springer A, Reck CA, Fartacek R, Horcher E. Appendix vermiformis as a left pyelo-ureteral substitute in a 6-month-old girl with solitary kidney. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2011 May 1;8(2):218-20.

Komyakov BK, Novikov AI, Ochelenko VA, Guliev BG, Al-Attar TK, Onoshko MV. Technical features of intestinal ureteroplasty. art 6: simultaneous ureteral and bladder substitution. Urologiia. 2017 Apr(1):12-5.

Esmat M, Abdelaal A, Mostafa D. Application of Yang-Monti principle in ileal ureter substitution: is it a beneficial modification?. Int Braz J Urol. 2012 Dec;38(6):779-87.